<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Numerical-Analysis on The Standard Error</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/numerical-analysis/</link><description>Recent content in Numerical-Analysis on The Standard Error</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.123.7</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/numerical-analysis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Numerical Analysis 1: Your Learning Rate Is a Step Size</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/numerical-analysis-1-step-size/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/numerical-analysis-1-step-size/</guid><description>Gradient descent is forward Euler on the gradient flow, so the learning rate is a discretisation step with a stability limit — exactly 2/λ_max on a quadratic, and on a network 2.04 times larger than that formula says, because the curvature moves to meet whatever step you chose.</description></item><item><title>Numerical Analysis 2: A Gradient Check Is a Finite Difference</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/numerical-analysis-2-gradient-check/</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/numerical-analysis-2-gradient-check/</guid><description>The error of a finite difference is a U in the step size, so a smaller step is not a safer one — and the step decides what your gradient check can see, by eight orders of magnitude in float64 and nine more once you change the precision. In bfloat16 a gradient 17% wrong passes at every step size.</description></item><item><title>Why My Integrator Exploded at t = 355, Every Single Time</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/posts/why-my-integrator-exploded-at-355/</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/posts/why-my-integrator-exploded-at-355/</guid><description>Two silent numerical bugs, and the kind of test that actually catches them</description></item></channel></rss>