<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Llm-Evaluation on The Standard Error</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/llm-evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Llm-Evaluation on The Standard Error</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.123.7</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/llm-evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ML 51: A Benchmark Is a Sample of Questions</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-51-benchmark-sample/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-51-benchmark-sample/</guid><description>A benchmark score&amp;#39;s error bar is correct, and a leaderboard of such scores still puts close models in the wrong order. Comparing on the same questions, and counting questions rather than prompts, is most of the repair.</description></item><item><title>ML 52: A Leaked Benchmark Shows in the Set, Not in the Item</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-52-contamination/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-52-contamination/</guid><description>A model trained on a benchmark&amp;#39;s answers scored higher on them and no higher on anything else. Its own likelihoods could not say which problems had leaked; a fresh set from the same source could say that some had.</description></item><item><title>ML 53: The Prompt Is Part of the Score</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-53-prompt-format/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-53-prompt-format/</guid><description>The same model on the same problems scored 0.735 or 0.500 depending on what came before them, and the gap between two models shrank from 0.127 to about zero. A score is the model under one way of asking.</description></item><item><title>ML 54: Multiple Choice Grades the Wrong Answers You Offered</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-54-multiple-choice/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-54-multiple-choice/</guid><description>Ranking answer options by likelihood is a different test from asking for the answer. A model that never produced a four-digit sum picked it out of four options 95.5% of the time, or 32%, depending on the options.</description></item><item><title>ML 55: Every Judge Ranked Itself First</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-55-judge/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-55-judge/</guid><description>Three models graded each other&amp;#39;s arithmetic by how right each answer looked to them. All three preferred their own answers on every task, and forty real labels were enough to correct them.</description></item></channel></rss>