<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Interpretability on The Standard Error</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/interpretability/</link><description>Recent content in Interpretability on The Standard Error</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.123.7</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/tags/interpretability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ML 11: Resample the Rows and the Tree Tells a Different Story</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-11-tree-stability/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-11-tree-stability/</guid><description>A decision tree is valued because it can be read. Refit on bootstrap resamples of the same data, its accuracy holds still and almost everything a reader would read off it moves.</description></item><item><title>ML 16: Permutation Importance Measures the Model, Not What the Data Need</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-16-permutation/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-16-permutation/</guid><description>Shuffle a column and see how much worse the model does: it is the importance episode 12 recommended. It answers a narrower question than it seems to, on rows the shuffle invented.</description></item><item><title>ML 17: Partial Dependence Asks the Model About Rows That Do Not Exist</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-17-pdp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-17-pdp/</guid><description>A partial dependence plot is read as a feature&amp;#39;s effect. With correlated inputs it is an average over combinations that never occur, and on a simulation with a known effect a forest&amp;#39;s shows about a third of it.</description></item><item><title>ML 18: A SHAP Value Is an Answer to "Compared With What?"</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-18-shapley/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-18-shapley/</guid><description>Shapley values split a prediction among its features fairly and uniquely — relative to a reference that the theory leaves to you. Computed exactly, the choice changes the story for most predictions.</description></item><item><title>ML 48: What a Model Relies On Is Not What to Change</title><link>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-48-intervention/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jongha-jeon-dev.github.io/standarderror/lectures/ml-48-intervention/</guid><description>Importance and what-if analyses describe the model. In a system with a common cause and a downstream signal, the feature the model relied on most did nothing when changed, and the real lever ranked no higher than a feature with no effect.</description></item></channel></rss>